Tuesday, April 15, 2008

#20

The Washington Post?

or

The New York Times?

12 comments:

Carla said...

Times. They have better Op Eds.

WAL said...

A few years ago I would have said the Times, but I am now a believer in the Washington Post.

You can't mess with their FIVE Pulitzers this past year...they broke Walter Reed and did that outstanding article about Josh Bell's busking. The paper has really matured over the last few years and has become a truly national paper.

Plus, they have the comics, while the Times does not.

Carl said...

Like WAL, I'd preferred the Times most of my life, just out of habit and longstanding fondness and familiarity. Then a couple of years ago I started to pay more attention to the Post, and was duly impressed with what I saw. Their investigative stuff, and their other prizewinning efforts have been remarkable.

Still, I wonder how much of the Pulitzer count has to do with how many scandals DC has going on. The travesties of our time have mostly happened there, after all. When one happens in NYC, for that matter, like the Spitzer thing, the Times is naturally all over it.

Plus, when it comes to the web, Where All Things Are Settled, the Times looks and works and acts much better. You throw in legendary crossword editor Will Shortz, and it's no contest.

The Decider said...

Small clarification for the record: GAO broke Walter Reed way before the Post. In that sense, the Post was late. Still, at least they wrote about it. Better late than never.

lslocum said...

No strong opinion on this one, but I tend toward the Times. So I'll go with that.

Anonymous said...

Times...

JB said...

I don't read the Times. Never have. I can't really compare them. So, I say Post.

Julia said...

Yea, I've finally arrived - my first post in a very serious forum!

I say the NY Times, simply on the fact you can play SET online.

http://www.nytimes.com/ref/crosswords/setpuzzle.html

Wicked Fun!

natalia said...

The Washington Post- I think it's because it was the first paper I started reading after I left Oberlin and the Plain Dealer. And every paper is better than the Plain Dealer. The Post blew my mind.

So, why leave a good thing? The Post.

natalia said...

The Washington Post- I think it's because it was the first paper I started reading after I left Oberlin and the Plain Dealer. And every paper is better than the Plain Dealer. The Post blew my mind.

So, why leave a good thing? The Post.

Carl said...

I forgot to mention this Pulitzer factoid, which also supports my theory that location matters a lot.

For this and all of the reasons cited above: The Times.

The Decider said...

The answer: The Washington Post